<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#34;It&#8217;s kinda a non-issue to me&#34;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-03/its-kinda-a-non-issue-to-me/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-03/its-kinda-a-non-issue-to-me</link>
	<description>Nothing Personal... Just good, raw, gay sex...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rawTOP</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-03/its-kinda-a-non-issue-to-me#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>rawTOP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=177#comment-292</guid>
		<description>ewelthorpe - I think meth and other drugs are the primary problem - not barebacking itself. It's one thing to do some light drugs where you stay pretty much in control. It's another to do something like meth that gets you to do things you wouldn't have done otherwise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ewelthorpe - I think meth and other drugs are the primary problem - not barebacking itself. It&#8217;s one thing to do some light drugs where you stay pretty much in control. It&#8217;s another to do something like meth that gets you to do things you wouldn&#8217;t have done otherwise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewelthorpe</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-03/its-kinda-a-non-issue-to-me#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>ewelthorpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 05:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=177#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Rawtop,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It's not surprising that guys are acting more and more reckless, and being more and more lax about STDs. Barebacking is becoming - possibly, has become - the predominant erotic stimuli. When those budding gay teens start looking at gay porn online, they see barebacking. When adults look for gay porn online, they see barebacking. Seems like more and more gay online sex outlets, from hookup sites to porn to blogs, are devoted to and eroticize barebacking. Maybe if there were the equivalent of cigarette pack warning labels - like photos of facial wasting, lipodystrophy, anal warts, etc - when you enter these sites and every few clicks, there would be a teeny bit more thought about the ramifications of barebacking. But right now, it's all about barebacking. That's all they see, all they know. So it's sadly no surprise people just ain't caring too much. I do hope safer sex is eroticized on a larger and more effective level (thanks Chi Chi LaRue!) and perhaps things will change a bit...  Meanwhile we just have to do our part to not enable that reckless behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rawtop,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not surprising that guys are acting more and more reckless, and being more and more lax about STDs. Barebacking is becoming - possibly, has become - the predominant erotic stimuli. When those budding gay teens start looking at gay porn online, they see barebacking. When adults look for gay porn online, they see barebacking. Seems like more and more gay online sex outlets, from hookup sites to porn to blogs, are devoted to and eroticize barebacking. Maybe if there were the equivalent of cigarette pack warning labels - like photos of facial wasting, lipodystrophy, anal warts, etc - when you enter these sites and every few clicks, there would be a teeny bit more thought about the ramifications of barebacking. But right now, it&#8217;s all about barebacking. That&#8217;s all they see, all they know. So it&#8217;s sadly no surprise people just ain&#8217;t caring too much. I do hope safer sex is eroticized on a larger and more effective level (thanks Chi Chi LaRue!) and perhaps things will change a bit&#8230;  Meanwhile we just have to do our part to not enable that reckless behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-03/its-kinda-a-non-issue-to-me#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=177#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Thanks - just so you know, I'm not trying to be argumentative, just trying to stay informed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks - just so you know, I&#8217;m not trying to be argumentative, just trying to stay informed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rawTOP</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-03/its-kinda-a-non-issue-to-me#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>rawTOP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=177#comment-289</guid>
		<description>benjamin - I said I &lt;i&gt;tested&lt;/i&gt; negative. That and the fact that I consistently test negative while I'm a bareback top means I'm pretty confident I actually am negative. But yes, there are no guarantees (but that's typical of life in general).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The 6 month thing is a half-truth put out by people who want you to live in fear. The test is 90% accurate after 2 or 3 weeks, 95% accurate after about a month, 99% accurate after 3 months, and fully accurate after 6 months.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thing is only nuns have zero sexual activity in 6 months, so the test is never fully accurate for anyone. So 90%+ accuracy after a few weeks is basically accurate.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Those same people who quote the 6 month thing, also never tell you that condoms fail 5 to 10% of the time. Their fear uncertainty and doubt (FUD) tactics are selective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>benjamin - I said I <i>tested</i> negative. That and the fact that I consistently test negative while I&#8217;m a bareback top means I&#8217;m pretty confident I actually am negative. But yes, there are no guarantees (but that&#8217;s typical of life in general).</p>
<p>The 6 month thing is a half-truth put out by people who want you to live in fear. The test is 90% accurate after 2 or 3 weeks, 95% accurate after about a month, 99% accurate after 3 months, and fully accurate after 6 months.</p>
<p>Thing is only nuns have zero sexual activity in 6 months, so the test is never fully accurate for anyone. So 90%+ accuracy after a few weeks is basically accurate.</p>
<p>Those same people who quote the 6 month thing, also never tell you that condoms fail 5 to 10% of the time. Their fear uncertainty and doubt (FUD) tactics are selective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-03/its-kinda-a-non-issue-to-me#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=177#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Pardon my ignorance if I'm way off here, but isn't it true that an HIV test needs to be six months from your last possible exposure in order to be fully accurate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon my ignorance if I&#8217;m way off here, but isn&#8217;t it true that an HIV test needs to be six months from your last possible exposure in order to be fully accurate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
