<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts Of A Neg Bareback Bottom &quot;Taking All Loads&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads</link>
	<description>Nothing Personal... Just good, raw, gay sex...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:00:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rawTOP</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads/comment-page-1#comment-12329</link>
		<dc:creator>rawTOP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=245#comment-12329</guid>
		<description>@loool - I&#039;m not sure what I think about it. If it had been gay sex I think the bottom would have had a great deal of the responsibility in becoming poz. Straight women are in a somewhat different position than a gay bottom. A far lower percentage of straight men are poz. Still, HIV is the leading killer of young black women, but I can sorta see where a white suburban woman might reasonably believe a guy when he says he&#039;s neg. In other words, I don&#039;t really know enough about the case to say anything for certain. I think it&#039;s a complex issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@loool &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure what I think about it. If it had been gay sex I think the bottom would have had a great deal of the responsibility in becoming poz. Straight women are in a somewhat different position than a gay bottom. A far lower percentage of straight men are poz. Still, HIV is the leading killer of young black women, but I can sorta see where a white suburban woman might reasonably believe a guy when he says he&#8217;s neg. In other words, I don&#8217;t really know enough about the case to say anything for certain. I think it&#8217;s a complex issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loool</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads/comment-page-1#comment-12324</link>
		<dc:creator>loool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=245#comment-12324</guid>
		<description>TORONTO — A Toronto man who knowingly exposed two unsuspecting lovers to HIV through repeated acts of unprotected sex was sentenced Friday to 56 months in prison.
“He has no excuse for his wanton, selfish and self-indulgent behaviour ... his deception was deliberate, calculated and continuing (to conceal his condition),” Justice Arthur Gans said of Vincent Walkem, 30.

“He showed blatant disregard to medical advice he was legally and morally obliged to adhere (disclosing his condition to sex partners).”

One of Walkems victims, now 23, contracted HIV from him.

Gans called her situation “a life sentence of indescribable and monumental proportions, merely to be exacerbated by the callous, selfish and wilful publication of her name” on his blog-site only weeks before his guilty plea.

The second victim, now 30, who had sex with him in 2004, hasnt contracted the disease.
Gans recommended Walkem go to a prison where university courses are available and his costly medication readily available.

Walkems youngest victim is struggling to pay for her own university tuition and expensive life-saving drugs, court heard.

Gans praised the two women for having the “the strength of courage each has demonstrated through this most difficult of ordeals.”

The HIV-infected victims father said “Walkem will always be a threat to society. He has no morality. How could he possibly?”

Walkem pleaded guilty last September to two counts of aggravated sexual assault for having unprotected sex with the two women without revealing he was HIV-positive.
The womens identities are protected by a publication ban.

“These are difficult cases because no sentence imposed will ever give the victim her health back,” said Crown attorney Mary Humphrey, who called for a six- to eight-year sentence.

Defence lawyer Graham Clark, who initially asked for a conditional sentence, asked for a reformatory sentence of under two years plus probation for his client, a first offender.
Gans said the now 23-year-old woman, who met Walkem in July 2002 and dated him for several months, was lied to when she asked if he was “clean” during their first encounter. The second victim was similarly misled, court heard.

According to an agreed statement of facts, Walkem tested positive in December 2001. In February 2002 he was warned by public health nurses to disclose his condition to any sex partners.

The 23-year-old testified she discovered Walkem was HIV positive from one of his co-workers in October 2002.

The woman learned she was HIV positive Dec. 4, 2002, and notified the police in 2003 and 2004 to prevent other women from contracting HIV from Walkem.

He was arrested Aug. 30, 2004, but only spent two months in custody and has been on bail since.

IMPO I think its about time that we had some legal recourse in this jurisdiction. IMO this constitutes assualt with a deadly weapon.

What are your views?

Support the conviction?

Do not support the conviction?

But remember this could happen to you.

Is the sentence enough?

Looking forward to your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TORONTO — A Toronto man who knowingly exposed two unsuspecting lovers to HIV through repeated acts of unprotected sex was sentenced Friday to 56 months in prison.<br />
“He has no excuse for his wanton, selfish and self-indulgent behaviour &#8230; his deception was deliberate, calculated and continuing (to conceal his condition),” Justice Arthur Gans said of Vincent Walkem, 30.</p>
<p>“He showed blatant disregard to medical advice he was legally and morally obliged to adhere (disclosing his condition to sex partners).”</p>
<p>One of Walkems victims, now 23, contracted HIV from him.</p>
<p>Gans called her situation “a life sentence of indescribable and monumental proportions, merely to be exacerbated by the callous, selfish and wilful publication of her name” on his blog-site only weeks before his guilty plea.</p>
<p>The second victim, now 30, who had sex with him in 2004, hasnt contracted the disease.<br />
Gans recommended Walkem go to a prison where university courses are available and his costly medication readily available.</p>
<p>Walkems youngest victim is struggling to pay for her own university tuition and expensive life-saving drugs, court heard.</p>
<p>Gans praised the two women for having the “the strength of courage each has demonstrated through this most difficult of ordeals.”</p>
<p>The HIV-infected victims father said “Walkem will always be a threat to society. He has no morality. How could he possibly?”</p>
<p>Walkem pleaded guilty last September to two counts of aggravated sexual assault for having unprotected sex with the two women without revealing he was HIV-positive.<br />
The womens identities are protected by a publication ban.</p>
<p>“These are difficult cases because no sentence imposed will ever give the victim her health back,” said Crown attorney Mary Humphrey, who called for a six- to eight-year sentence.</p>
<p>Defence lawyer Graham Clark, who initially asked for a conditional sentence, asked for a reformatory sentence of under two years plus probation for his client, a first offender.<br />
Gans said the now 23-year-old woman, who met Walkem in July 2002 and dated him for several months, was lied to when she asked if he was “clean” during their first encounter. The second victim was similarly misled, court heard.</p>
<p>According to an agreed statement of facts, Walkem tested positive in December 2001. In February 2002 he was warned by public health nurses to disclose his condition to any sex partners.</p>
<p>The 23-year-old testified she discovered Walkem was HIV positive from one of his co-workers in October 2002.</p>
<p>The woman learned she was HIV positive Dec. 4, 2002, and notified the police in 2003 and 2004 to prevent other women from contracting HIV from Walkem.</p>
<p>He was arrested Aug. 30, 2004, but only spent two months in custody and has been on bail since.</p>
<p>IMPO I think its about time that we had some legal recourse in this jurisdiction. IMO this constitutes assualt with a deadly weapon.</p>
<p>What are your views?</p>
<p>Support the conviction?</p>
<p>Do not support the conviction?</p>
<p>But remember this could happen to you.</p>
<p>Is the sentence enough?</p>
<p>Looking forward to your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natlman4u</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads/comment-page-1#comment-6819</link>
		<dc:creator>natlman4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=245#comment-6819</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s hot because he&#039;s crossed into the knowledge that true freedom is allowing yourself to ignore the puritanical panic and bs that is sex in America.  Go dude--you lead us on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s hot because he&#8217;s crossed into the knowledge that true freedom is allowing yourself to ignore the puritanical panic and bs that is sex in America.  Go dude&#8211;you lead us on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads/comment-page-1#comment-4654</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=245#comment-4654</guid>
		<description>This could have been written by me, and he explained it quite accurately. I am poz now and I am totally cool with it. Currently I am searching for more poz playmates and working on becoming more versatile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could have been written by me, and he explained it quite accurately. I am poz now and I am totally cool with it. Currently I am searching for more poz playmates and working on becoming more versatile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duo</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads/comment-page-1#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Duo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=245#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Wow, unbelievably personal -- and HOT. Thank you for taking the time to write out so beautifully what you&#039;ve been going through. I felt like I was reading my own thoughts. And thank you Rawtop for thinking to post this!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, unbelievably personal &#8212; and HOT. Thank you for taking the time to write out so beautifully what you&#8217;ve been going through. I felt like I was reading my own thoughts. And thank you Rawtop for thinking to post this!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rawTOP</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads/comment-page-1#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>rawTOP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=245#comment-397</guid>
		<description>@nybb1972 - True, but that&#039;s sorta his point... He&#039;s not a total cumdump and doesn&#039;t want to be. &quot;All loads&quot; to him means no risk reduction strategies...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s a journey and it&#039;s interesting where he&#039;s at in that journey. Most guys going what he&#039;s going through don&#039;t discuss it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nybb1972 &#8211; True, but that&#8217;s sorta his point&#8230; He&#8217;s not a total cumdump and doesn&#8217;t want to be. &#8220;All loads&#8221; to him means no risk reduction strategies&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a journey and it&#8217;s interesting where he&#8217;s at in that journey. Most guys going what he&#8217;s going through don&#8217;t discuss it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nybb1972</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads/comment-page-1#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>nybb1972</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=245#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Hmmm - taking all loads not only implies neg, poz, or unknown, but also from guys you don&#039;t find attractive! Seems this guy still has a ways to go to be a true cum dump....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8211; taking all loads not only implies neg, poz, or unknown, but also from guys you don&#8217;t find attractive! Seems this guy still has a ways to go to be a true cum dump&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BareBottom1980</title>
		<link>http://www.rawtop.com/blog/2008-06/thoughts-of-a-neg-bareback-bottom-taking-all-loads/comment-page-1#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>BareBottom1980</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawtop.com/blog/?p=245#comment-394</guid>
		<description>That was possibly one of the hottest things I&#039;ve read on this blog... mainly because I can identify with the bottom completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was possibly one of the hottest things I&#8217;ve read on this blog&#8230; mainly because I can identify with the bottom completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
