The Hypocrisy Of Some Anti-Bareback Porn Models
You’re probably wondering why in the fuck I’ve got a woman on a gay porn blog. I have a point to make so bear with me for a moment… [And give me a little credit - I picked pics where you can't see any pussy - I don't even show much of her boobs...]
There are certain porn models out there who start doing bareback porn and then get “born again” and decide bareback porn is bad and stop doing it. Bo Dean, the heavily tattooed top in this scene, is one of the bareback porn models who’s gone anti-bareback. Jeremy Bilding is another. From what I’ve heard part of their decision comes down to the fact that some of the big gay porn companies won’t work with guys who do bareback. A few won’t work with models who’ve ever done bareback porn.
I understand that a guy may have a change of heart and decide not to bareback for personal reasons. That’s not what I’m talking about here. I’m talking about guys who won’t do bareback porn for completely absurd reasons…
For example, in this scene from SG4GE (Straight Guys 4 Gay Eyes) you see “born again” anti-bareback Bo Dean fucking another guy, ummmm… BAREBACK. Apparently it’s OK to bareback a guy if there’s a girl in the room. I’m sorry, but that’s just hypocritical and sorta stupid as well.
Another example this past week was a scene on CocksureMen.com that featured two boyfriends but the guys were wearing condoms in the scene. Let’s just say I’d bet someone money that they bareback in real life (and I know I’d win). To me that just totally shows total the total hypocrisy of condom porn. It also shows how fake condom porn is. There’s a reason why bareback porn is popular – IT’S REAL.
But in a number of cases I’m getting the last laugh. Try googling ‘Leo Giamani‘ and you’ll see my page showing Leo Giamani’s bareback videos is either #1 or #2 in the search results. Now try googling ‘Bo Dean porn‘ and you’ll see once again my page with Bo Dean’s bareback videos is #1 in the search results. They may (for good or bad reasons) decide not to bareback, but they can’t ever deny that they did it at one point in time…
[And just for the record, the guy getting fucked raw by Bo Dean is bisexual Tex Gemmell. As far as I know he's not anti-bareback.]
View the full scene on SG4GE.com
18 U.S.C 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Three points:
(1) Do you know when this scene was filmed? I am guessing that it was filmed before Bo Dean woke up to himself and realized that his health is worth more than a few dollars.
(2) What evidence do you have that the “boyfriends” are really that? Porn sites have a tendency to lie about their models. Often they are described as straight, which they most certainly aren’t.
(3) AIDS is a very nasty disease. Wearing a condom is so much easier living with HIV. The side effects from the drugs are so bad that you often wish you were dead.
@”No fat faggots”
1) Tex Gemmell is pretty new to Jake Cruise Media so the scene can’t be all that old.
2) I can’t say more than “I know for sure”.
3) Many people don’t agree with you.
I have to agree with you rawTOP. It also happens on Corbin Fisher’s site Amateur College Sex. For the past few months, when there is a girl present and he is shooting a bi scene or a teasing scene, they go without condoms when the guys fuck. But on his other site Amateur College Men, condoms are always present. And he uses the same guys on the same sites. I don’t understand.
People have a right to choose what they want to do with their body. If each of the models have tested clean and feel comfortable barebacking, then great. they can bareback in their scene together.
But if they don’t want to bareback, for whatever reason, they have every right not to. Because of friends I know who are now living with HIV, I personally don’t bareback regularly. It’s my personal choice. However, if both my partner and I have recently tested clean and feel comfortable, I’ll give bareback a go. Isn’t it logical then that porn stars might do the same thing at their discretion.